Home
Excessing and Article 12
The Collective Bargaining Agreement and the Joint Contract Interpretation Manual (JCIM) require management to meet with the union representatives at the Area/Regional level to discuss the contractual provisions that must be complied with when reassignments (excessing) takes place. Often times these meetings are successful in lessening the impact and minimizing the disruption and inconvenience to postal workers.
Whenever management anticipates excessing will take place from an installation, USPS Area management provides the union's regional coordinator with an Impact Statement. When the regional coordinator receives the Impact Statement, he disseminates the information to the affected locals for input.
Locals that represent the losing and gaining installations are invited to participate to ensure that management provides them with all relevant information. Information is then solicited from the locals to verify the number and types of jobs being withheld to accommodate the reassignment of affected employees.
Locals are encouraged to discuss all excessing outside of the installation with the coordinator.
Post Excessing Report
The JCIM requires that management provide a report to the APWU regional office reflecting who was excessed, the employees' status, and where they were excessed to.
Comparative Work-Hour Report
Article 12 stipulates that when employees are excessed out of their installation, the union at the national level may request a comparative work-hour report of the losing installation, 60 days after the excessing of such employees.
The comparative work-hour study can be a critical factor in challenging improper excessing. If the report fails to substantiate that business conditions warranted the action, Article 12, provides that, the retreat rights of the employees shall be activated, and they will be permitted to bid on vacancies in their original installation.
Note: In accordance with the JCIM, locals should request these reports through the regional coordinator, who will secure the data from the USPS Area office.
Moratorium
The extension of the 200-2003 Collective Bargaining Agreement imposed a moratorium on excessing APW-represented employees more than 50 miles, unless the employee is slotted into a vacancy created as a result of the early-out provisions of the contract extension. This moratorium will end six months after management provides the APWU with its plan for plant consolidation, which now known as the Integrated Network Plan.
In the interim, the extension agreement has significantly reduced the number of employees being excessed out of their installation.
Pros and Cons
Although staffing has been reduced at virtually all facilities due to automation, excessing outside the installation has been avoided in many cases due to attrition, contractual provisions, and the hard work of local union officials and the NBAs.
To date, few employees have been moved out of large installations, but many employees have been moved out of small facilities.
Downsizing has been the result of many management actions: Function One studies, Function Four studies, and the Labor Scheduler software, which is designed to reduce staffing. The Automated Package Parcel Sorter (APPS) machines, which will be deployed on a wide scale in 2004 and 2005, will replace Small and Bundle Sorters. We have experienced non-stop deployment of automated equipment.
From 1998 to 2003, the APWU lost 51,553 Clerk Craft career employees, 248 Motor Vehicle Operators, and 52 Vehicle Maintenance employees. We have gained 415 Maintenance Craft employees. In 2003 alone, there was a reduction of 54 million work-hours nationwide. Management projects an additional reduction of 25 million work-hours in 2004. This means a loss of 11,000 more employees.
The Letter Carrier Craft has lost 11, 409 employees, and the Mail Handler Craft has lost 5, 471 employees during the same period. The only craft other than maintenance to experience an increase is the Rural Letter Carrier Craft, which gained 9, 370
These facts have severely limited the conversion of part-time flexibles to full time. According to Article 12, only large installation (those that meet the criteria of 125or more man years) can force conversions to full-time while an installation is withholding vacancies. However, if part-time flexibles are working in non-impacted hours, conversions should take place.
Management has resisted making the conversion s in some places, but we have won arbitrations and settled cases for conversions on this issue.
Not a Single Layoff
With all the downsizing, not a single APWU member has been laid off. We are part of perhaps the only industry in the country that can make such a claim.
If it wasn't for the APWU, 51000 clerks could have been simply laid off. But because of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, and the APWU's work to enforce Article 12, no APWU-represented employees have lost their jobs.
ABOUT THE SOUTHERN REGION COORDINATOR'S OFFICE
William E. Sullivan
Southern Region Coordinator
15055 Woodham Drive, S. 100
Houston, Texas 77073-6024
Phone: 281-821-9000
Fax: 281-821-9028
The Southern Region Coordinator is responsible for organizing the union’s grievance activity at the Step 3 level and arbitration in 11 states. He supervises the scheduling of Step 3 grievances throughout the region; scheduling arbitration hearings for the cases that remain unresolved, and assigns the union’s advocates.

Printer-Friendly Page