SPSS Merits Award

The Arbitrator, for the reasons set forth in the above Opinion, denies the following claims: the claim by the National Postal Mail Handlers Union [NPMHU], that the issuance by the United States Postal Service, on August 7, 2015, of the revised Craft Determination for the Small Parcel Sorter System [SPSS], was improper, insofar as the USPS changed its June 1, 2015, award of the “singulating”/“facing” work on the platform to Mail Handler Craft employees, by awarding such work to the Clerk Craft employees, and by its related assignment to those Clerks of some of the “sweeping” work (removing full containers from the SPSS and replacing them with empty containers) for rotational purposes only, insofar as such assignments were inconsistent with RI-399 Craft determination principles and with certain previously decided Arbitration Opinions and Awards; the claim by the American Postal Workers Union [APWU] that the USPS, in its revised determination of August 7, 2015, improperly awarded “sweeping” work to Mail Handler Craft employees, as the primary Craft, with the award of some of the “sweeping” work, for rotational purposes only, to those Clerk Craft employees who were assigned to perform the work of “singulating”/“facing” parcels, rather than assigning all of the “sweeping” work to Clerk Craft employees. 61 AWARD The Arbitrator, for the reasons set forth in the above Opinion, denies the following claims: the claim by the National Postal Mail Handlers Union [NPMHU], that the issuance by the United States Postal Service, on August 7, 2015, of the revised Craft Determination for the Small Parcel Sorter System [SPSS], was improper, insofar as the USPS changed its June 1, 2015, award of the “singulating”/“facing” work on the platform to Mail Handler Craft employees, by awarding such work to the Clerk Craft employees, and by its related assignment to those Clerks of some of the “sweeping” work (removing full containers from the SPSS and replacing them with empty containers) for rotational purposes only, insofar as such assignments were inconsistent with RI-399 Craft determination principles and with certain previously decided Arbitration Opinions and Awards; the claim by the American Postal Workers Union [APWU] that the USPS, in its revised determination of August 7, 2015, improperly awarded “sweeping” work to Mail Handler Craft employees, as the primary Craft, with the award of some of the “sweeping” work, for rotational purposes only, to those Clerk Craft employees who were assigned to perform the work of “singulating”/ “facing” parcels, rather than assigning all of the “sweeping” work to Clerk Craft employees.

SPSS , Clerk Craft , RI-399

return to Contract Database

The Arbitrator, for the reasons set forth in the above Opinion, denies the
following claims: the claim by the National Postal Mail Handlers Union
[NPMHU], that the issuance by the United States Postal Service, on August 7,
2015, of the revised Craft Determination for the Small Parcel Sorter System
[SPSS], was improper, insofar as the USPS changed its June 1, 2015, award of
the “singulating”/“facing” work on the platform to Mail Handler Craft
employees, by awarding such work to the Clerk Craft employees, and by its
related assignment to those Clerks of some of the “sweeping” work (removing
full containers from the SPSS and replacing them with empty containers) for
rotational purposes only, insofar as such assignments were inconsistent with
RI-399 Craft determination principles and with certain previously decided
Arbitration Opinions and Awards; the claim by the American Postal Workers
Union [APWU] that the USPS, in its revised determination of August 7, 2015,
improperly awarded “sweeping” work to Mail Handler Craft employees, as the
primary Craft, with the award of some of the “sweeping” work, for rotational
purposes only, to those Clerk Craft employees who were assigned to perform
the work of “singulating”/“facing” parcels, rather than assigning all of the
“sweeping” work to Clerk Craft employees.
61
AWARD
The Arbitrator, for the reasons set forth in the above
Opinion, denies the following claims: the claim by the
National Postal Mail Handlers Union [NPMHU], that
the issuance by the United States Postal Service, on
August 7, 2015, of the revised Craft Determination for
the Small Parcel Sorter System [SPSS], was improper,
insofar as the USPS changed its June 1, 2015, award of
the “singulating”/“facing” work on the platform to
Mail Handler Craft employees, by awarding such work
to the Clerk Craft employees, and by its related
assignment to those Clerks of some of the “sweeping”
work (removing full containers from the SPSS and
replacing them with empty containers) for rotational
purposes only, insofar as such assignments were
inconsistent with RI-399 Craft determination
principles and with certain previously decided
Arbitration Opinions and Awards; the claim by the
American Postal Workers Union [APWU] that the
USPS, in its revised determination of August 7, 2015,
improperly awarded “sweeping” work to Mail Handler
Craft employees, as the primary Craft, with the award
of some of the “sweeping” work, for rotational
purposes only, to those Clerk Craft employees who
were assigned to perform the work of “singulating”/
“facing” parcels, rather than assigning all of the
“sweeping” work to Clerk Craft employees.

Document Type:  Award

GATS Number:  15281315

Craft:  Clerk

Arbitrator Name: Joseph Sharnoff

Tags: SPSS , Clerk Craft , RI-399

return to Contract Database